On the use of sampling costs in quality control to select an estimator for the variance and standard deviation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of İndustrial Engineering, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey

2 Faculty of Engineering ,Department of İndustrial Engineering Gebze Technical University, Gebze/Kocaeli ,Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

In R and S-charts in quality control applied to a normal population one mostly uses a linear transformation of the range or the sample deviation as unbiased estimators of the unknown process standard deviation. In this paper, we propose related statistics as alternative estimators of the unknown standard deviation and variance having a smaller mean squared error. At the same time, we give a theoretical explanation for the rules of thumb recommended in quality control which unbiased estimators to use. Since obtaining samples from different independent subgroups is costly, we propose a mathematical model for selecting these samples to satisfy the budget constraint. The used estimator for the variance or standard deviation has a minimal mean squared error within a certain class of estimators. It is shown that selecting the whole sample from one particular chosen subgroup is a good strategy for linear sampling costs.

Keywords


  1. Abbaszadehpeivasti, H. and Frenk, J. B. G. (2023). On the method of moment approach applied to a generalized gamma distribution. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 52, 3685–3708.
  2. Alzer, H. (1997). On some inequalities for the gamma and psi functions. Mathematics of Computation, 66, 373–389.
  3. Arciszewski, T. J. (2023). A review of control charts and exploring their utility for regional environmental monitoring programs. Environments, 10, 78.
  4. Arnold, S. F. (1990). Mathematical Statistics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  5. Arnold, B. C. and Balakrishnan, N. and Nagaraja, H. N. (2008). A First Course on Order statistics. SIAM, Philadelphia.
  6. Casella, G. and Berger, R. L. (2002). Statistical Inference (Second Edition). Duxbury, Pacific Grove.
  7. Cho, E., and Cho, M. J. (2008). Variance of sample variance. Section on Survey Research Methods-JSM, 2, 1291–1293.
  8. David, H. A. (1970). Order statistics. Wiley, New York.
  9. Devor, R., Sutherland, J. and Chang, T-H. (1992). Statistical Quality Design and Control: Contemporary Concepts and Methods. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  10. Figueiredo, F. and Gomes, M. I. (2006). Box-Cox transformations and robust control charts in SPC. In Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology VII, (pp. 35-46), World Scientific, New Jersey.
  11. Harter, H. L. (1960). Tables of range and studentized range. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 31, 1122–1147.
  12. Irwin, M. and Miller, M. (2004). John E. Freund’s Mathematical Statistics: With Applications. Prentice Hall, New York.
  13. Mahmoud, M. A., Henderson, G. R., Epprecht, E. K., and Woodall, W. H. (2010). Estimating the standard deviation in quality-control applications. Journal of Quality Technology, 42, 348–357.
  14. Makis, V. (2008). Multivariate Bayesian control chart. Operations Research, 56, 487–496.
  15. Montgomery, D. C. (2009). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Wiley, New York.Ryan, T. P. (2011). Statistical Methods of Quality Improvement. Wiley, New York.
  16. Suman, G. and Prajapati, D. (2018). Control chart applications in healthcare: a literature review. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 9, 5. 
  17.  Vardeman, S. B. (1999). A brief tutorial on the estimation of the process standard deviation. IIE transactions, 31, 503–507.
  18. Woodall, W. H., and Montgomery, D. C. (2000). Using ranges to estimate variability. Quality Engineering, 13, 211–217.
  19. Wilks, S. S. (1962). Mathematical Statistics (Second Edition). Wiley, New York.
  20. Zwetsloot, I. M. Jones-Farmer, A. and Woodall, W. H. (2023). Monitoring Univariate processes using control charts: some practical related issues and advice. Quality Engineering, 36, 487– 499.
CAPTCHA Image